<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>Security and the Net &#187; Short newslinks</title> <atom:link href="http://securityandthe.net/category/short-newslinks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://securityandthe.net</link> <description>News and opinions about security, the internet and more</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:11:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator> <cloud domain='securityandthe.net' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' /> <item><title>Printing handcuff keys</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/09/18/printing-handcuff-keys/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=printing-handcuff-keys</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/09/18/printing-handcuff-keys/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:43:35 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1506</guid> <description><![CDATA[At this year&#8217;s Hacking At Random event/conference (HAR2009), a member of SSDeV (the &#8220;Sportenthusiasts of Lockpicking&#8221;) managed to pull off a very cool stunt: he copied a key for police handcuffs without owning the original key itself. What he did was print a key using a 3D printer; the key was created and checked by [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/09/18/printing-handcuff-keys/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>How not to respond to security issues</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/08/15/how-not-to-respond-to-security-issues/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=how-not-to-respond-to-security-issues</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/08/15/how-not-to-respond-to-security-issues/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:48:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1474</guid> <description><![CDATA[Wat is the worst response you can give when someone alerts you about a security issue in your software? I can almost hear you thinking: &#8220;waiting two years to fix it&#8220;, but there is an even worse response. Some companies just simple don&#8217;t respond at all. Simply amazing&#8230; After verifying the issue we contacted the [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/08/15/how-not-to-respond-to-security-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Squirrelmail plugins altered by hackers</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/08/04/squirrelmail-plugins-altered-by-hackers/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=squirrelmail-plugins-altered-by-hackers</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/08/04/squirrelmail-plugins-altered-by-hackers/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:37:31 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1470</guid> <description><![CDATA[Last month, the webserver hosting the popular open source webmail suite SquirrelMail was compromised. At that time, the maintainers thought no source code had been altered: At approximately 1700 GMT, on June 16, it was discovered that the SquirrelMail webserver had been compromised. The project administrators took immediate action to mitigate any futher compromises, locking [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/08/04/squirrelmail-plugins-altered-by-hackers/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>92% of Flash users affected by 0-day hole?</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/07/26/92-of-flash-users-affected-by-0-day-hole/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=92-of-flash-users-affected-by-0-day-hole</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/07/26/92-of-flash-users-affected-by-0-day-hole/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:12:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[flash]]></category> <category><![CDATA[psi]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1433</guid> <description><![CDATA[Secunia released some interesting statistics last week; according to their numbers, at least 92% of the people using their PSI scanner that have Flase Player installed are running a version that is affected by the zero-day attack that was recently discovered. The real number might be even higher; they didn&#8217;t release combined numbers for users [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/07/26/92-of-flash-users-affected-by-0-day-hole/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Browser Security Lessons from the Chrome team</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/19/browser-security-lessons-from-the-chrome-team/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=browser-security-lessons-from-the-chrome-team</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/19/browser-security-lessons-from-the-chrome-team/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:14:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1418</guid> <description><![CDATA[ACM Queue has just added a new paper by Charles Reis, Adam Barth and Carlos Pizano. It expands upon the information published earlier about the effectiveness various browsers&#8217; update mechanisms, adding information about the measures taken to keep users from visiting malicious websites and, more importantly, the ways in which they prevent the inevitable bugs [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/19/browser-security-lessons-from-the-chrome-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Belgian government releases source code for election software</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/18/belgian-government-releases-source-code-for-election-software/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=belgian-government-releases-source-code-for-election-software</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/18/belgian-government-releases-source-code-for-election-software/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:56:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1405</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Belgian government has just released the source code for the software used in the 2008 elections to the public. The news was first reported by the Open Source Observatory &#38; Repository Europe; the files are presented in two zipfiles that contain mostly C and C++ source code. As the OSOR found, there appears to [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/18/belgian-government-releases-source-code-for-election-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Astalavista &#8220;hacker community&#8221; hacked.</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/07/astalavista-hacker-community-hacked/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=astalavista-hacker-community-hacked</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/07/astalavista-hacker-community-hacked/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:12:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[astalavista]]></category> <category><![CDATA[hack]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1355</guid> <description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, the self-proclaimed &#8220;hacker community&#8221; Astalavista (not to be confused with the other Astalavista) has been targeted by hackers itself. While this site isn&#8217;t as popular as it was years ago, I&#8217;d consider this a rather high-profile target; in this case, the so-called &#8220;anti-sec group&#8221; thought so as well. They posted this message [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/07/astalavista-hacker-community-hacked/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The downside of automatic updates</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/05/08/the-downside-of-automatic-updates/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-downside-of-automatic-updates</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/05/08/the-downside-of-automatic-updates/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:33:40 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[browser security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1306</guid> <description><![CDATA[Just days after a report co-authored by Google claimed that the automatic update feature of the Chrome browser help improve security by silently installing patches without asking for approval from the user, the managed to demonstrate the downside of this approach. On May 5th, a patch was rolled out to fix two security issues; just [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/05/08/the-downside-of-automatic-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Remote root exploit for Linux machines running SCTP applications</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/04/28/remote-root-exploit-for-linux-machines-running-sctp-applications/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=remote-root-exploit-for-linux-machines-running-sctp-applications</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/04/28/remote-root-exploit-for-linux-machines-running-sctp-applications/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:42:21 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[linux]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sctp]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1276</guid> <description><![CDATA[There appears to be a serious vulnerability in Linux kernel versions &#60; 2.6.28-git8. This was reported as a potential denial-of-service issue in many places; but it now appears to be more serious than that. This site over at blogspot.com posted exploit code that supposedly allows an attacker to gain root privileges on machines running sctp [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/04/28/remote-root-exploit-for-linux-machines-running-sctp-applications/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Was 4chan&#8217;s creation of Twitter accounts stopped, or did they lose interest?</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/04/21/was-4chans-creation-of-twitter-accounts-stopped-or-did-they-lose-interest/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=was-4chans-creation-of-twitter-accounts-stopped-or-did-they-lose-interest</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/04/21/was-4chans-creation-of-twitter-accounts-stopped-or-did-they-lose-interest/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:04:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[4chan]]></category> <category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1227</guid> <description><![CDATA[With the race to reach 1 million followers between Ashton Kutcher and CNN over, let&#8217;s look back at the runner-up that was on track to beat both to the finish line: @basementdad. Last week, some people on the 4chan site decided they wanted to join the race. And for a day or so, they were [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/04/21/was-4chans-creation-of-twitter-accounts-stopped-or-did-they-lose-interest/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Black Hat Europe update: Trust issues?</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/04/16/black-hat-europe-update-trust-issues/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=black-hat-europe-update-trust-issues</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/04/16/black-hat-europe-update-trust-issues/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:51:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bgp hijacking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[blackhat]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mpls]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1204</guid> <description><![CDATA[The &#8220;Kaminsky 2.0&#8243; at Black Hat today turned out to be  the talk from Daniel Mende and Enno Rey, dealing with vulnerabilities in the BGP and MPLS protocols. From what I can tell, there was no real news; most of the information they presented has been available for a while. The fact that BGP has [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/04/16/black-hat-europe-update-trust-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Adobe finally patches flaw in Reader, needs to update blog platform</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/20/adobe-finally-patches-flaw-in-reader/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=adobe-finally-patches-flaw-in-reader</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/20/adobe-finally-patches-flaw-in-reader/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:13:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[adobe reader]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1118</guid> <description><![CDATA[Almost a month after admitting there was an easily exploitable buffer overflow in its Reader product, Adobe has finally managed to produce patches for Adobe Reader versions 7 and 8. Adobe itself has rated this as a critical issue, the highest severity rating they have, but it still took them about three weeks to produce [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/20/adobe-finally-patches-flaw-in-reader/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Microsoft&#8217;s Silverlight used on YouTube</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/20/microsofts-silverlight-used-on-youtube/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=microsofts-silverlight-used-on-youtube</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/20/microsofts-silverlight-used-on-youtube/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:44:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[flash]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1111</guid> <description><![CDATA[If the rumors about IBM buying Sun weren&#8217;t enough, this news should prove once and for we live in interesting times: Silverlight has made its way to YouTube. It&#8217;s used on the CBS March Madness channel, and the feeds themselves are not served by Google, but it is an interesting development nonetheless. Up until now, [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/20/microsofts-silverlight-used-on-youtube/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>MS09-08: When is a patch not a patch?</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/16/ms09-08-when-is-a-patch-not-a-patch/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=ms09-08-when-is-a-patch-not-a-patch</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/16/ms09-08-when-is-a-patch-not-a-patch/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:28:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[dns]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1097</guid> <description><![CDATA[&#8230; when it doesn&#8217;t patch! That was an easy question, but Microsoft has a different opinion on this. In this blog post at 360 Security, Tyler Reguly explains why he thinks MS09-08 is not really a patch; it doesn&#8217;t actually fix the vulnerability that it is supposed to fix. MS09-08 contains an update that &#8220;fixes&#8221; [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/16/ms09-08-when-is-a-patch-not-a-patch/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google adds Apps Status Dashboard</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/27/google-adds-apps-status-dashboard/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=google-adds-apps-status-dashboard</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/27/google-adds-apps-status-dashboard/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:36:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1074</guid> <description><![CDATA[Following the large Gmail outage earlier this week, Google has launched a status page for their most important hosted services called Google Apps Status Dashboard. It&#8217;s hard for me to believe that they created this in two days, so they must have been preparing this for a while; but it&#8217;s a useful page nonetheless. In [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/27/google-adds-apps-status-dashboard/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Did the EU just admit Skype calls can be intercepted?</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/27/did-the-eu-just-admit-skype-calls-can-be-intercepted/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=did-the-eu-just-admit-skype-calls-can-be-intercepted</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/27/did-the-eu-just-admit-skype-calls-can-be-intercepted/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:26:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[skype]]></category> <category><![CDATA[zfone]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1069</guid> <description><![CDATA[Eurojost, the European Union&#8217;s Judicial Cooperaion Unit, has just issued a press release that was meant to clarify reports about the EU looking into methods to intercept Skype calls. Instead, it has only increased speculation about alleged backdoors built into the Skype software: In September 2006, a first strategic meeting on internet telephony took place [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/27/did-the-eu-just-admit-skype-calls-can-be-intercepted/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Wikileaks leaks identities of 58 donors</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/22/wikileaks-leaks-identities-of-58-donors/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=wikileaks-leaks-identities-of-58-donors</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/22/wikileaks-leaks-identities-of-58-donors/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:36:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1037</guid> <description><![CDATA[The popular leaks website wikileaks.org has become the victim of it&#8217;s own success: last week, private information about Wikileaks was posted on wikileaks.org! The information posted was a copy of a request for donations sent out to 58 people that had donated before. Instead of adding the recipients as BCC, all addresses were in the [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/22/wikileaks-leaks-identities-of-58-donors/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Patch Tuesday: does Microsoft need a new severity rating?</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/07/patch-tuesday-does-microsoft-need-a-new-severity-rating/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=patch-tuesday-does-microsoft-need-a-new-severity-rating</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/07/patch-tuesday-does-microsoft-need-a-new-severity-rating/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:51:10 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=942</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve never quite liked Microsoft&#8217;s severity rating system for security vulnerabilities; todays pre-announcement for this months patch tuesday provides a very good example of the problem I have with it. Microsoft provides four severity levels for security issues, and the different ratings appear to make sense at first sight: So what is the problem? The [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/07/patch-tuesday-does-microsoft-need-a-new-severity-rating/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Gmail also hit by incorrect malware list</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/02/gmail-also-hit-by-incorrect-malware-list/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=gmail-also-hit-by-incorrect-malware-list</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/02/gmail-also-hit-by-incorrect-malware-list/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:25:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Spammers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category> <category><![CDATA[malware]]></category> <category><![CDATA[spam]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=926</guid> <description><![CDATA[After receiving some reports of mail incorrectly flagged as spam or phishing attempts, Google has confirmed that the problem with their malware list also caused mail to Gmail accounts to be marked as spam: This morning there was a problem with the implementation of Google&#8217;s malware filters. Gmail&#8217;s spam engine uses those filters (among hundreds of other [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/02/gmail-also-hit-by-incorrect-malware-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Enhancing Blackberry security</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/01/28/enhancing-blackberry-security/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=enhancing-blackberry-security</link> <comments>http://securityandthe.net/2009/01/28/enhancing-blackberry-security/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:47:08 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Short newslinks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=882</guid> <description><![CDATA[While I don&#8217;t like to read press releases, let alone quote them, this one managed to catch my attention. It introduces a product called &#8220;Mobile PKI&#8221; for Blackberry&#8217;s, that promises to enhance the security of communications between Blackberry devices and your company&#8217;s servers: Amongst others Mobile PKI (BlackBerry) supports companies at: Secure use of BlackBerry’s [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://securityandthe.net/2009/01/28/enhancing-blackberry-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: securityandthe.net @ 2010-07-31 23:19:08 by W3 Total Cache -->