<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 3GS security improvements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/09/iphone-3gs-security-improvements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/09/iphone-3gs-security-improvements/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=iphone-3gs-security-improvements</link>
	<description>News and opinions about security, the internet and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:40:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maarten</title>
		<link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/09/iphone-3gs-security-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-2669</link>
		<dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1365#comment-2669</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads-up; it appears to be fixed now (at least on Ubuntu 9.1 with Epiphany 2.28).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads-up; it appears to be fixed now (at least on Ubuntu 9.1 with Epiphany 2.28).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free blog</title>
		<link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/09/iphone-3gs-security-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-2666</link>
		<dc:creator>free blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1365#comment-2666</guid>
		<description>Hello there, I&#039;m using Kubuntu Linux 8.1 and the Epiphany 2.0 web browser, and your blog looks rather screwed up. Might want to look into it. I&#039;m out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there, I&#8217;m using Kubuntu Linux 8.1 and the Epiphany 2.0 web browser, and your blog looks rather screwed up. Might want to look into it. I&#8217;m out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zimmie</title>
		<link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/09/iphone-3gs-security-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1415</link>
		<dc:creator>Zimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1365#comment-1415</guid>
		<description>I suspect that the encryption is simply to make remote wipe instantaneous.  Encrypt everything in storage, and when you receive the wipe command, flush the key.  No need to purge what is being stored.  No extra hassle for the user, because the key is stored for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that the encryption is simply to make remote wipe instantaneous.  Encrypt everything in storage, and when you receive the wipe command, flush the key.  No need to purge what is being stored.  No extra hassle for the user, because the key is stored for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Boyd Ann Arbor guy</title>
		<link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/09/iphone-3gs-security-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Boyd Ann Arbor guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1365#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>The security features sound nice but like you said those words seem awfully carefully chosen. Maybe things aren&#039;t what they appear to be.

Time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The security features sound nice but like you said those words seem awfully carefully chosen. Maybe things aren&#8217;t what they appear to be.</p>
<p>Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abcyes</title>
		<link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/06/09/iphone-3gs-security-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>abcyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1365#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>A standard needs to be created so all phones from all brands on all networks (including computers with webcams) can video call with each other. (If hardly anyone can talk with each other, like if you could only talk to other iPhone owners, it won&#039;t ever catch on)

Cell networks need to be dramatically improved to allow for anything close to wide-spread usable quality. (people need to just know that video calling will work no matter where they are before they start regularly using it. If it seems spotty, they&#039;ll just forget about it)

Until then it will be an extremely buggy, gimmicky feature that you might use to show off but when it came down to it, would sit idle. They&#039;re BARELY getting MMS standardized between different carriers (even just a few years ago it was big news that Verizon and Sprint could send pictures to each other) and phones and imagine how simple that is compared to live streaming video.

share your views at http://www.iPhone3GS.org it&#039;s just for the iPhone 3G s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A standard needs to be created so all phones from all brands on all networks (including computers with webcams) can video call with each other. (If hardly anyone can talk with each other, like if you could only talk to other iPhone owners, it won&#8217;t ever catch on)</p>
<p>Cell networks need to be dramatically improved to allow for anything close to wide-spread usable quality. (people need to just know that video calling will work no matter where they are before they start regularly using it. If it seems spotty, they&#8217;ll just forget about it)</p>
<p>Until then it will be an extremely buggy, gimmicky feature that you might use to show off but when it came down to it, would sit idle. They&#8217;re BARELY getting MMS standardized between different carriers (even just a few years ago it was big news that Verizon and Sprint could send pictures to each other) and phones and imagine how simple that is compared to live streaming video.</p>
<p>share your views at <a href="http://www.iPhone3GS.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.iPhone3GS.org</a> it&#8217;s just for the iPhone 3G s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

