<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Security issue in djbdns confirmed</title> <atom:link href="http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/05/security-issue-in-djbdns-confirmed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/05/security-issue-in-djbdns-confirmed/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=security-issue-in-djbdns-confirmed</link> <description>News and opinions about security, the internet and more</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:04:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator> <item><title>By: Ishwor&#8217;s munge, some drivels.. &#187; Programmers making changes</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/05/security-issue-in-djbdns-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-1007</link> <dc:creator>Ishwor&#8217;s munge, some drivels.. &#187; Programmers making changes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:22:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1079#comment-1007</guid> <description>[...] news, then you&#8217;d also know that djb awarded some Matthew Dempskey the promised $1,000 for finding a security bug in djbdns. The patch&#8217;s a [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news, then you&#8217;d also know that djb awarded some Matthew Dempskey the promised $1,000 for finding a security bug in djbdns. The patch&#8217;s a [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonas B.</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/05/security-issue-in-djbdns-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-963</link> <dc:creator>Jonas B.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 10:38:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=1079#comment-963</guid> <description>To be fair, you&#039;re suppsed to run qmail smtpd process under ulimit. So I have to side with DJB on that one: It is clearly a bug but not exploitable on a proper installation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, you&#8217;re suppsed to run qmail smtpd process under ulimit. So I have to side with DJB on that one: It is clearly a bug but not exploitable on a proper installation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: securityandthe.net @ 2010-07-31 23:04:36 by W3 Total Cache -->