<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this a new virus, or are virus scanners just slow to catch it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/08/is-this-a-new-virus-or-are-virus-scanners-just-slow-to-catch-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/08/is-this-a-new-virus-or-are-virus-scanners-just-slow-to-catch-it/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-this-a-new-virus-or-are-virus-scanners-just-slow-to-catch-it</link>
	<description>News and opinions about security, the internet and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:40:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/08/is-this-a-new-virus-or-are-virus-scanners-just-slow-to-catch-it/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=948#comment-714</guid>
		<description>@jcanto: Sorry, completely missed that! I updated the post, thanks for the reply and for providing this great service!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jcanto: Sorry, completely missed that! I updated the post, thanks for the reply and for providing this great service!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcanto</title>
		<link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/08/is-this-a-new-virus-or-are-virus-scanners-just-slow-to-catch-it/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>jcanto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=948#comment-708</guid>
		<description>&quot;Update 9-2: As tr0stvik noted, at the time I wrote this Virustotal failed to list the versions and update times of the tested scanners. I resubmitted the file again today; the results are here. Currently, 17 out of 39 scanners detect the virus.&quot;

Try to research before you say something. In certain cases (when the file has been previosly scanned by the email interface), that info is not shown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Update 9-2: As tr0stvik noted, at the time I wrote this Virustotal failed to list the versions and update times of the tested scanners. I resubmitted the file again today; the results are here. Currently, 17 out of 39 scanners detect the virus.&#8221;</p>
<p>Try to research before you say something. In certain cases (when the file has been previosly scanned by the email interface), that info is not shown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tr0stvik</title>
		<link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/08/is-this-a-new-virus-or-are-virus-scanners-just-slow-to-catch-it/comment-page-1/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>tr0stvik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 07:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=948#comment-649</guid>
		<description>Hmm, in the result pdf, why isn&#039;t there any date and scanner versions showing? Something wrong with Virus-total when you uploaded the file, or something wrong with your browser?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, in the result pdf, why isn&#8217;t there any date and scanner versions showing? Something wrong with Virus-total when you uploaded the file, or something wrong with your browser?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

