<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Is this a new virus, or are virus scanners just slow to catch it?</title> <atom:link href="http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/08/is-this-a-new-virus-or-are-virus-scanners-just-slow-to-catch-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/08/is-this-a-new-virus-or-are-virus-scanners-just-slow-to-catch-it/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=is-this-a-new-virus-or-are-virus-scanners-just-slow-to-catch-it</link> <description>News and opinions about security, the internet and more</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:04:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator> <item><title>By: martin</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/08/is-this-a-new-virus-or-are-virus-scanners-just-slow-to-catch-it/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link> <dc:creator>martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:24:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=948#comment-714</guid> <description>@jcanto: Sorry, completely missed that! I updated the post, thanks for the reply and for providing this great service!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jcanto: Sorry, completely missed that! I updated the post, thanks for the reply and for providing this great service!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jcanto</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/08/is-this-a-new-virus-or-are-virus-scanners-just-slow-to-catch-it/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link> <dc:creator>jcanto</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:49:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=948#comment-708</guid> <description>&quot;Update 9-2: As tr0stvik noted, at the time I wrote this Virustotal failed to list the versions and update times of the tested scanners. I resubmitted the file again today; the results are here. Currently, 17 out of 39 scanners detect the virus.&quot;Try to research before you say something. In certain cases (when the file has been previosly scanned by the email interface), that info is not shown.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Update 9-2: As tr0stvik noted, at the time I wrote this Virustotal failed to list the versions and update times of the tested scanners. I resubmitted the file again today; the results are here. Currently, 17 out of 39 scanners detect the virus.&#8221;</p><p>Try to research before you say something. In certain cases (when the file has been previosly scanned by the email interface), that info is not shown.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tr0stvik</title><link>http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/08/is-this-a-new-virus-or-are-virus-scanners-just-slow-to-catch-it/comment-page-1/#comment-649</link> <dc:creator>tr0stvik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 07:31:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityandthe.net/?p=948#comment-649</guid> <description>Hmm, in the result pdf, why isn&#039;t there any date and scanner versions showing? Something wrong with Virus-total when you uploaded the file, or something wrong with your browser?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, in the result pdf, why isn&#8217;t there any date and scanner versions showing? Something wrong with Virus-total when you uploaded the file, or something wrong with your browser?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: securityandthe.net @ 2010-07-31 23:02:46 by W3 Total Cache -->